Players consider themselves equal in this deal from buryw's blog

I'm in a unique position. I played for eight seasons in"Battlefield" Madden NFL 23. three with the "old" CBA and Madden 23 coins my final five seasons under the current CBA which is scheduled to expire following the 2020 season. I've seen firsthand the changes in the schedule for training camps (no more two-a-days , and more days off) and the offseason programming (fewer months and hours at and around the facilities). It's much more comfortable for the body right now, there's no doubt.

However, if you listen carefully, it has not lowered the Madden NFL 23 injury rate. The majority of the medical side would concur that less practice time has resulted in more injury-related injuries in game because the bodies of players aren't prepared to handle the immense physical impact of playing Sundays.

Madden NFL 23 managers know they could persuade players with the promise of shorter practice times and more games, but most retired players, like myself, would've taken the extra money for an increase in time for practice.

While the goal of the Madden NFL 23 owners is to attract players with little of everything before the regular seasonstarts, I'm of the opinion that this shouldn't be one of the main reasons Madden NFL 23 players decide on 17 games.

More money and health benefits are what players should be fighting for

Players consider themselves equal in this deal , and advancing to 17 games increases the possibility of injury as well as an accelerated career. They are looking for more than the owners are offering48.5 percent of the revenue split 48.5 percent of the revenue split- to make it happen. I believe that an increase of 49 percent could convince them to commit to 17 games and 50 percent would certainly get a deal done.

The question mark remains what else goes along with those 17 game proposals? Are the increased retirement benefits and minimum salaries dependent on the 17-game concept? Are they going to disappear if players don't want to play 17 games? If yes, do higher wages for younger players and more benefits and benefits for retired players be worth losing up to 49 or even 50 percent of the revenue split?

Many players would think it's. The care of the whole collective is the main goal of the union, and cheap mut coins If sacrificing one percent or two gives the main players more money , they'd definitely be for it.